The
cognitive development theory has claimed that teachers and educators can learn
about children’s thinking by attentively listening to them and closely observing
how they use their thinking skills to solve certain problems. If it is accomplished, it would be easier for
the teachers to use different teaching methodologies and techniques which is
more adequate to their level
A
typical classroom have students of different level in which their capabilities,
thinking, experiences and knowledge varies from one another. According to Case
(1985) teachers can identify and understand individual’s abilities and their
weaknesses only by observing how they attempt to solve certain problems.
For
example teacher can observe the procedures they follow during the task, the
kinds of logic they use, how they use their thinking and reasoning skills, how they
attempt to solve certain task like directly trying to complete the given task
or divide it into parts and then solve the problem. In addition, it is very
important to understand how they correct errors and observe whether they repeat
the same mistakes or how they reduced those errors. In order to understand such
think teachers can even ask them how they solve the problem.
Another
important application discussed in cognitive theory is matching the strategies
and the activities to student’s ability (Woolfolk, 2012).To do this, teachers can make the
lesson interesting and effective to the students by using an elastic approach
of teaching and assigning the work according to their level and interest. Which
means student should not get bored by giving too much of work or they must not thought
things which is higher than their level. Also drills and rote learning must be
discourage as it affect their development.
When
developing a curriculum for the children the educators need to consider the
cognitive developmental stages and include various aspects which enhance the
intellectual growth of children at every stages in a sequential form. In
teaching and learning environment the teachers have to make the student
actively participate and encourage them to involve in various task.
As
discussed by (Aggarwal, 2005)
it is important to use different teaching techniques and activities that
enhances students development in organized and systematic manner. Such
activities can be storytelling, reciting poetry and rhymes, singing, role-plays
and so on. In addition, to cater their intellectual development the teachers
must use different teaching aids such as picture, videos, graph and many more. Such
material used for teaching have to be simple and familiar to the students and
they should have relate on the lesson.
CONCLUSION
Despites
the influence of Piagetian theory on developmental psychology and education,
many psychologist disagree with his explanation as it lacks some important
aspect such as environmental factors, consistency in children’s thinking and
even their physical development and how it effects in their learning (Woolfolk,
2012).
Some psychologist also debates on the four different stages of children’s
thinking thus they also believes to certain extent children goes through the
changes that describe in the theory.
Although
this theory believes environment factors directly not effect on children
development it emphasized on the importance of social interaction with
environment. Meanwhile the theory mostly describes the four developmental
stages and how development happens in one stage and then moves on to next stage
through organized scheme and active construction of knowledge.
As
discussed in the theory developmental changes from one stage to another stage
may varies in individuals however every child moves in a sequential order
followed by one another. Basically cognitive development theory is a not only
enhances on children’s intellectual growth but also develop their social
cognition and emphasizes on education which help them to improve themselves.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REFERENCE
Aggarwal, J. C. (2005). Essentials of Educational
Psychology. New Delhi: Vikash Publishing House Pvt Ltd.
Case, R. (1985). Intellectual
Development: Birth to Adulthood. New York: Academic Press.
Furth , F. H.,
& Wachs, H. (1974). Thinking goes to school: Piaget's theory in practice.
Vol 12 ( 2 ). N. Y : Oxford, 24.
Ginsburg, H.,
& Opper, S. (1988). Piaget's Theory of Intellectual Development.
Cambridge: Prentice-Hall.
John, W. S.
(2011). Educational Psychology (5th ed.). NewYork: McGraw - Hill.
Orlendo, L.,
& Machado, A. (1996). In Defence of Piaget's Theory: A Reply to 10 Common
Critisms.Vol,103(1). Amerivan Psychological Association, 143-146.
Seifert , K.,
& Sutton, R. (2009). Educational Psychology (2nd ed.). Zurich:
Global Text Project.
Wadsworth, B.
(1996). Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive and Affective Development (5th ed.).
New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, Inc.
Woolfolk, A.
(2012). Educational Psychology (12th ed.). NewYork: Allyn & Bacon.
Fascinating stuff there. I personally find Piaget's theory a bit too rigid. I feel like the environment would have a more direct impact on the child.
ReplyDeleteI have some questions I would like to discuss.
1. How does behaviorism figure into all of this?
2. How do we figure out whether the child has moved onto the next development stage?
3. How can a teacher implement this theory in a classroom where the students might be in different stages? Particularly regarding the concrete operational stage and formal operational stage?
On the contrary Rose, I believe that Piaget's theory would make a more direct change in the student's learning. Although the environment and society do have their drawbacks, a class should be an enjoyable experience where one would also learn many things. Being surrounded by students myself, I have observed many things, and in classes where there are many projects and group work, I find there to be more students interested in the subject. For example, in a history class the teacher took the boring bits and acted them out with the class as enthusiastically as he could. This helped the students to remember what would have floated past their ears and increased their knowledge dramatically. As for the students in different stages, I personally think that it would be better not to separate them as much; later in life these young students will have to be able to communicate with their co-workers and partners. If you do implement the theory to point where it goes too far, the students will never learn how to cooperate with people that have different skills than them.
DeleteBasing on the fact that history is normally taught in middle/high school classes, I would assume that the students in your example are in the fourth stage of the CDT. So basically, students in this particular age group can be given hypothetical scenarios regarding history and they would be able to develop their own personal view, depending on the social interactions he/she has right? Does this mean that the teacher/parent can actually steer the discussion in any particular direction and help shape the child's opinion? My main point, however, is that when one takes into account the different child development rates and such, just how you, as a parent or a teacher, identify the stage the child is in, in the third and fourth stage, just how do you try to teach them? I would assume in the fourth stage, being that the child is able to form his own opinions even on hypothetical situations, this is where the teacher can have discussions/debates on things relating to the topic being covered in order to expand the child's perspective.
ReplyDelete